|
Post by Chalupa! on Sept 26, 2004 0:50:12 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by rabidgecko on Sept 26, 2004 7:24:33 GMT -8
I dunno man. Those pictures could have been tampered with by someone who has the right software.
|
|
|
Post by trashbag on Jan 3, 2005 5:27:53 GMT -8
Yes..well I think that the terrorists are secretly on our side and the planes target was originally intended to make contact with the ufo. Sadly, they missed and the ufo hovered there for a few seconds dazed, but decided to go into outerspace to pick up Donald from our "never ending story' who is currently stuck on a meteorite in a delusional state waving frantically for Donna to notice him.
Nice pics! The blur adds autistic flare, I mean artistic flair.
|
|
|
Post by Compbasher on Jun 17, 2005 20:12:42 GMT -8
Heh, nice explanation Trash.
On the video of the first UFO, most people and media said it was debris flying from the burning tower. Now can't based only on the fact that the projectile is moving too fast. If most of us are familar with physics, I need not go into detail with the law involving acceleration with no air resistance. Even though real life Earth has air resistance, most objects (given its not paper or feathers, etc.) will fall at the same rate. Since the projective completely clears the picture in a matter of a few frames (which would represent maybe a second), I believe that this one "thing" is in fact a UFO(many not with aliens, but in general an unidentified flying object. Most people automatically assume UFO's with extraterrestial life.)
The video didn't pop-up for the 2nd UFO so I can't make full reference to the 2nd sighting, but it does explain everything pretty well, and if no one did tamper with it, it looks legit.
|
|