dxlightning
Platinum Membership
[ss:LostPeon's Gray][ss:LostPeon's Gray]
Posts: 1,246
|
Post by dxlightning on Aug 18, 2006 19:56:13 GMT -8
Who saw it, who doesn't want to see it, and why?
|
|
|
|
Post by greeny on Aug 18, 2006 20:35:18 GMT -8
Don't want to.
Here's why: Picture a whole bunch of movie execs around a table:
Exec#1: Hey.. you guys, we need a new, fresh movie idea.
Exec#2: Hmmm... how about a movie about planes?
Exec#3: Everyone's doing planes now!
Exec#4: What about a movie where we combine SNAKES and planes?
Exec#1: Hmmm but how would we combine those two?
Exec#2: Hm.... How about... Snakes on a Plane!
AllExecs: Ooooooh.
Exec#1: Bold!
Exec#3: And let's put Samuel L. Jackson in a starring role because he makes every movie good!
What the f**k! SNAKES?! Jesus. No dice.
|
|
|
|
Post by Chalupa! on Aug 18, 2006 20:36:30 GMT -8
Yeah, it seems stupid to me. I'm sure it has action and is probably not a bad a movie, but the idea stinks to me. I doubt I will see it at the movies. Maybe on Dvd.
|
|
|
|
Post by rbobatar on Aug 18, 2006 21:08:09 GMT -8
SNAKES ON A PLANE WAS AN OSCAR WORTHY MOVIE WHICH PORTRAYED THE CLASS STRUGGLE IN A MOST DUBIOUS LIGHT IN WHICH THOSE ON COACH AND IN FIRST CLASS EXHIBITED ALL THE CHARACTERISTICS PERTAINING TO WHICH RBOB HAS SPOKEN OF. ALSO SAMUEL L JACKSON IS AN AMERICAN HERO AND SHOULD BE GIVEN A NOBEL PRIZE FOR HIS PERFORMANCE IN THIS MOVIE WHICH DID IN FACT HAVE SNAKES ON A PLANE IN IT. ANYONE WHO SAYS ANYTHING BAD ABOUT THIS MOVIE SHUOLD BE BEHEADED.
|
|
|
|
Post by mephistool on Aug 18, 2006 21:14:45 GMT -8
Proof to all rbob haters that rbob is infact, not a racist. Thats a reason enough to see this movie.
|
|
|
|
Post by grayfox7 on Aug 18, 2006 21:42:08 GMT -8
Don't want to. Here's why: Picture a whole bunch of movie execs around a table: Exec#1: Hey.. you guys, we need a new, fresh movie idea. Exec#2: Hmmm... how about a movie about planes? Exec#3: Everyone's doing planes now! Exec#4: What about a movie where we combine SNAKES and planes? Exec#1: Hmmm but how would we combine those two? Exec#2: Hm.... How about... Snakes on a Plane! AllExecs: Ooooooh. Exec#1: Bold! Exec#3: And let's put Samuel L. Jackson in a starring role because he makes every movie good! What the f**k! SNAKES?! Jesus. No dice. Only problem with this is Sam Jackson arrived on the project after its inception and wasn't immediately thought of as a selling point for the film. I'll probably see it at some point in a theater (I hear the audiences are really enthusiastic, which is always a plus) but I do think it had become quite irritating as an internet phenomenon. |
|
dxlightning
Platinum Membership
[ss:LostPeon's Gray][ss:LostPeon's Gray]
Posts: 1,246
|
Post by dxlightning on Aug 19, 2006 7:47:22 GMT -8
Actually greeny it's more like this.
A bunch of Dreamworks execs sitting around a table...
Exec#1: Hm...I wonder what the worst name for a movie would be?
Execs 2 and 3 ponder....
Exec#3: SNAKES ON A PLANE!
All 3: Yes!!!!
Also, Samuel L Jackson wasn't asked to be in the movie. He in fact joined the movie before seeing the script simply because the name was Snakes on a Plane.
I went to see it, and no it's not a very good movie, but it was worth it because everyone in the theater was just so thrilled to see Samuel L Jackson killing some motherf**king snakes on a motherf**king plane that they were cheering and throwing rubber snakes around...it was more fun to be in the theater than to watch the movie.
So personally, I thought it was worth the money and I'd go see it again just for the hell of it.
|
|
|
|
Post by greeny on Aug 19, 2006 11:24:31 GMT -8
If you're serious about that... then I would too  |
|
dxlightning
Platinum Membership
[ss:LostPeon's Gray][ss:LostPeon's Gray]
Posts: 1,246
|
Post by dxlightning on Aug 19, 2006 14:02:24 GMT -8
I'm completely serious about that. Actually it's better than the previews make it look.
|
|
|
|
Post by rbobatar on Aug 19, 2006 15:29:58 GMT -8
RBOB WAS ALMOST FORCIBLY REMOVED FROM THE MOVIE THREATRE FOR ATTEMPTING TO BRING ORDER TO THE RIOTOUS AUDIENCE
|
|
