|
Post by Deanguisher on Sept 10, 2006 18:03:05 GMT -8
I think they made the biggest mistakes of their lives doing this but i'd like to know what you guys think. Do you agree that Pluto shouldn't be a planet or do you think it should be still a planet and remain a planet? They were also thinking before all of this happened that they would add 3 more planets to our solar system. This is what it would look like if they did add these into our solar system Now do you think this should have happened or do you think Pluto should have been Demoted to a Comet
|
|
|
Post by rbobatar on Sept 10, 2006 18:06:56 GMT -8
IT HAS BEEN DEMOTED TO A DWARF PLANET NOT A COMET AND THE COMET CERES WAS GOING TO BE INCLUDED WITH THE STUPIDOTHER PLANETS WHICH IS NOT ILLUSTRATED ON YOUR STUPID DIAGRAM
|
|
|
Post by mephistool on Sept 10, 2006 20:29:25 GMT -8
I dont see what the big deal is about this. What did pluto ever do for us? It's not the end of the world just because we dont have some midget ball of ice in our solar system.
|
|
|
Post by jonathonkiler on Sept 10, 2006 22:17:56 GMT -8
I mostly think that it was stupid to demote it at all. "If it ain't broke, don't fix it."
Also, every single textbook that stated that we have 9 planets has to be edited in future editions. What a waste of time.
|
|
|
Post by defectivegnome on Sept 11, 2006 15:32:05 GMT -8
Also, every single textbook that stated that we have 9 planets has to be edited in future editions. What a waste of time. *gasp* This will be the first time in the history of the world that textbooks have had old and incorrect information that will have to be updated for future versions. Seriously, how many textbooks that are still in use in North America do you think refer to Russia as the Soviet Union? Why do people act like we're hurting Pluto's feelings by not calling it a planet anymore? Or think it should stay a planet because it's been on for 70 years. The whole point of this definition is so when we start discovering new solar systems, astronomers are able to label their planets and have everyone agree instead of arguing about what they should be called. Whether we call pluto a planet or not doesn't matter, we just needed the definition.
|
|
|
Post by mortalcry on Sept 11, 2006 16:24:52 GMT -8
still a useless piece of rock any way you put it...
|
|
|
Post by technohawk on Sept 12, 2006 0:07:39 GMT -8
still a useless piece of rock any way you put it... Unless it has life........ And if it has life, it has oil. If it has oil, it has terrorists and must be liberated. Thank the Lord ALmighty there's a republican in the white house who knows how to start a war. Cus plutonians are about to get a taste of democracy, Dubya style be-atch. (It's late, I'm not drunk but am sleep deprived, Go Bomber's Go)
|
|
|
Post by mortalcry on Sept 13, 2006 18:46:35 GMT -8
I may have a belief in christ, but i dont believe in politics, hence i think they are all crooks. Point is im sure its all about money in some sort of publishing way. Or maybe its a good way to kill more trees. Perhaps, maybe, we can take even more text out of the NEW history books and make children even that much more DUMB than they are now. That way, teachers wont have to work as hard as they FEEL they have to. Wow, all that from a scientific dicovery of how pluto is not a major planet? What an incomprehensible world we live in, blinded from truth and niave to the simplicities of life, all because we have an uncontrollable passion to control what cannot be controlled by humans. But if we can SEE it then we can CONTROL it, right? Perhaps 1,000 years from now, if man could let go of his greed for money. NOTE: Oh, and if your wondering if money is the "root of all evil", buy something nice for someone you like. If you get a BAD reaction it's because you presented it wrong. DISCLAIMER: not responsible for reactions based on this!!
-Pluto is still just a rock.
|
|
|
Post by rbobatar on Sept 18, 2006 15:30:26 GMT -8
YOU FOOL IT IS NOT THE MONEY THAT IS THE ROOT OF ALL EVIL BUT THE WANT OF MONEY AND BY MONEY IT MEANS WORLDLY POSSESSIONS SUCH AS LAND, COMMODITIES, WOMEN AND THE LIKE. CURRENCY IS USELESS WITHOUT THAT WHICH CAN BE PURCHASED THROUGH ITS USE. ALSO IF YOU BELIEVE IN CHRIST YOU ARE BY DEFINITION AN IDIOT AND WILL BE DEALT WITH ACCORDINGLY UPON THE RISE OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER.
|
|
|
Post by LostPeon™ on Sept 18, 2006 18:00:58 GMT -8
POSSESSIONS SUCH AS LAND, COMMODITIES, WOMEN
|
|
|
Post by Chalupa! on Sept 18, 2006 18:01:14 GMT -8
I totally agree! I'm sure you cringe at the thought of a liberal in office (like Clinton) who did nothing to Osama when he had the chance, and so many died as a result. Isn't is great to finally have a president with balls!? You get an exalt for that one...
Oh, but i'm not sure what this has to do with Pluto really (it was a far stretch) but I had to agree with you anyways!
|
|
|
Post by technohawk on Sept 18, 2006 19:05:36 GMT -8
yay i got an exalt for being sarcastic.
But i will admit Clinton missed oportunities to take out Osama, but so did Bush. IN their defence almost no president has taken terrorism very seriously until after a terrorist attack.
But as you said, this doesn't have anything to do with pluto.
Ill go take your liberal test now.
|
|
|
Post by Chalupa! on Sept 18, 2006 19:47:31 GMT -8
Well, you got an Exalt anyways... even if you didn't mean it.
Yeah, take the test - I'm curious which ones are really true.
Oh, and Pluto is very cool too. And Cold.
|
|
|
Post by mortalcry on Sept 19, 2006 13:19:34 GMT -8
RBOB, don't quote something i didn't say. i did NOT say that MONEY IS THE ROOT OF ALL EVIL, quit trying to speed read. You are only recieving half the text.....but your revolution gives me a good laugh.
Pluto is still a rock.
|
|
|
Post by rbobatar on Sept 19, 2006 16:44:46 GMT -8
RBOB DOESNT CARE. RBOB READS WHAT RBOB SEES FIT TO READ AND RBOB BASES HIS PSTATEMENTS ON WHAT RBOB READS AND NOT WHAT RBOB NOT READS.
|
|